This page summarizes information about the selected resource and its origin based on SPASE metadata.
SPASE version 2.2.1
Voyager 2 Planetary Radio Astronomy (PRA) Highband receiver daily files during Jupiter Encounter (1979-06-01 to 1979-07-30). Associated with these binary data are a series of quick-look GIF plots created using the binary data. The plots are available for both polarization channels.
The data set provides 48 second resolution highband radio mean power data in units of millibels. The high-band receiver consisted of 128 channels of 200 kHz bandwidth each, with center frequencies spaced at 307.2 kHz intervals from 1.2 MHz to 40.4 MHz. The highband receiver was designed especially for the observation of Jovian decametric radio emissions. The PRA radiometer was usually operated routinely in the so-called POLLO sweeping mode, in which all 198 frequency channels of the high- and low-band receivers together were swept in 6 sec, dwelling at each channel for 25 msec. From one step to the next in the channel switching sequence, the antenna polarization sense was reversed, i.e., was changed from RH to LH or vice versa. Thus the time required for making a measurement of both the RH and LH intensity components at both senses of elliptical polarization at a given frequency was 12 sec. The data consists of successive averages of 4 pairs of RH and LH intensity measurements, each average spanning an interval of 48 sec.
The format of these binary data files is as follows:
file separation variable
year, month, day information
millisecond decimal value of the day
Integer array (128,2) for 128 left and right channels (NOTE 128 channels for Hi-band; 70 channels for Lo-band)
file separation variable
There is an IDL program that reads these files into an IDL-format save set. See Information URL for a link to this file.
The data are calibrated and are given in units of 'millibels' which is 1000 times the log of the received power. Zero millbels corresponds to approximately 1.4 x 10^-21 W m^-2 Hz^-1, however, this value is never seen in practice. The minimum values detected, which includes receiver internal and spacecraft generated noise, are about 2300 to 2400 millibels, or about 3.5 x 10^-19 W m^-2 Hz^-1; even higher values are seen at the very lowest frequencies.
Note: The polarization indicated is the received polarization, not necessarily the emitted polarization. Correct interpretation of the received polarization depends on the antenna plane orientation relative to the radio source. A good description of this concept can be found in
Leblanc Y., Aubier M. G., Ortega-Molina A., Lecacheux A., 1987, J.Geophys. Res. 92, 15125 and in
Wang, L. and Carr, T.D., Recalibration of the Voyager PRA antenna for polarization sense measurement, Astron. Astrophys., 281, 945-954, 1994. and references therein.
Information about the PRA instrument on the Voyager mission including operational mode descriptions.
NSSDC Master Catalog description of the Voyager 2 PRA Instrument
An IDL program that will read these Voyager PRA highband binary files and convert to IDL save sets.
When using delivered data please acknowledge the data provider.
| Role | Person | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Principal investigator | Dr. James W. Warwick |
Within this directory list are the binary data files for Voyager 1 and 2 PRA highband.
When using delivered data please acknowledge the data provider.
Year, month, and day in the format YYMMDD
Electric field power spectral density, an average of 8 sweeps of the PRA highband receiver of 128 frequency channels each.
SPASE version 2.2.1
The Planetary Radio Astronomy (PRA) experiments' primary objective is to locate and explain kilometric, hectometric, and decametric radio emissions from the planets, to measure plasma resonances near the giant planets, and to detect lightning on the giant planets. They have also been successful at observing solar radio emissions from the perspective of the outer solar system.
The Voyager Planetary Radio Astronomy experiment is designed to investigate naturally-occurring radio emissions from the outer planets and Sun. Radio emissions from Jupiter have been known from Earth-based measurements since 1955 (Burke, B. F., and K. L. Franklin, Observations of a variable radio source associated with planet Jupiter, J. Geophys. Res., 60, 213–217, 1955.); PRA represents the first attempt to survey those emissions, and to perform near- encounter searches for radio emissions from the other gas planets.
Radio emissions can be used to determine the rate of rotation of the inner core of a planet; to determine the existence of a magnetic field and search for magnetic anomalies. Radio emissions are often the only remote diagnostic for interactions occurring in the portions of magnetospheres through which a spacecraft does not pass. This is particularly true for the inner magnetosphere, which usually goes unsampled.
PRA is also sensitive to impacts on the spacecraft by micron- sized dust particles. Particularly in its high data rate modes, the information obtained therefrom produces insights into the processes which occur under such situations.
Instrument Description ====================== There were two receivers on each spacecraft, for the lower and higher frequency ranges, respectively. The low-band receiver had 70 channels of 1.0 kHz bandwidth each, with center frequencies spaced at 19.2 kHz intervals from 1.2 kHz to 1326kHz. The high-band receiver consisted of 128 channels of 200 kHz bandwidth each, with center frequencies spaced at 307.2 kHz intervals from 1.2 MHz to 40.4 MHz. The high-band receiver was designed especially for the observation of Jovian decametric radio emissions.
The PRA receivers were driven by two orthogonal antennas mounted on the spacecraft body. Each antenna element is made of BeCu hollow tubes 0.5 inches in diameter and is 10 meters in length. By combining the signals from the two antennas in a 90 degree hybrid, the PRA instrument can distinguish between the opposing states, left hand and right hand, of circular polarization of an incoming wave.
The Planetary Radio Astronomy (PRA) receivers were calibrated under environmentally-controlled conditions and over the entire frequency and dynamic range of the instruments. This calibration consisted in application of a known narrow-band signal across the inputs and recording the receiver outputs.
The laboratory calibrations provided power levels for each data number (DN) and each frequency in terms of known inputs across the antenna terminals of each of the experiment's two monopoles. Calibrations were carried out over a range of receiver temperatures, but in practice the stability of the receiver as a function of temperature and the stability of the temperature of the receiver as a function of mission phase and the status of the overall spacecraft were such that a single calibration for each DN at each frequency could be used.
Receiver output levels were quantized. The minimum value for the wave flux density was frequency dependent varying from 5.E-20 W M**-2 Hz**-1 at frequencies below 1.5 MHz to 5.E-19 at frequencies above 1.5 MHz. The maximum wave flux density was typically 50 dB above the minimum value. The instrument noise level also was frequency dependent. It was about 1.E-19 W M**-2 Hz**-1 below 1.5 MHz. The noise at 10 MHz was still about 1E-19 W M**-2 Hz**-1, increased to about 1.E-17 W M**-2 Hz**-1 at 25 MHz, and then decreased to an intermediate value at 40 MHz.
The low-band and high-band operation of the receiver differ. In low-band the receiver operated with a sharply tuned filter only 1 kHz broad at the 3 dB points and in high-band, with a 200 kHz filter. The gain of the receivers was designed in such a way that the output increased discontinuously by 23 dB (corresponding to the 200:1 bandwidth ratio) between the lowest frequency of high-band and the highest frequency of low-band. This caused the instrument output to remain constant across the high-band to low-band transition point if its input was broadband noise.
If unpolarized radiation fell orthogonally on each monopole, the total unpolarized flux density for signals below about 5 MHz could be roughly estimated to be
S = So (10**(m/1000)),
where m was the channel reading in millibels and So is
So = 1.5E-21 (W/Hz m**2).
No reliable method for estimating the flux density exists for frequencies above 5 MHz due to the increasing effect of antenna resonances.
Although the PRA instrument had 14 possible operating modes, in practice the mode called POLLO was used more than 95% of the time. In POLLO, the receiver swept through all 198 channels in sequence from the highest frequency to the lowest. At each frequency step, data were produced every 30 msec, consisting of 25 msec of integration and 5 msec of switching and settling time. Thus, a full sweep through all 200 channels took 6 sec (including 60 msec for two status words). Between steps the 90 degree hybrid was switched such that the receiver was sensitive to the alternate sense of circular polarization. This toggling between left hand and right hand polarization itself alternated with each 6 sec receiver sweep. Thus, for a given frequency, a pair of left hand and right hand measurements were 6 sec apart.
For further details on the PRA instrument see Warwick, J.W. et al., Planetary Radio Astronomy Experiment for Voyager Missions, Space Science Reviews, 21, 309-327, 1977 and,
Lang, G.J. and Peltzer, R.G., Planetary Astronomy Receiver, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Elecronics Systems, AES-13, 466-472, 1977.
For further details on calibration see Wang, L. and Carr, T.D., Recalibration of the Voyager PRA antenna for polarization sense measurement, Astron. Astrophys., 281, 945-954, 1994. and references therein.
Information about the Planetary Radio Astronomy (PRA) instrument on the Voyager 2 mission.
Information about the PRA instrument on the Voyager mission including operational mode descriptions.
Information about the PRA instrument on the Voyager spacecraft.
| Role | Person | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Principal investigator | Dr. James W. Warwick |
| 2. | DeputyPI | Mr. Joseph K. Alexander, Jr. |
| 3. | CoInvestigator | Dr. Andre C. Boischot |
| 4. | CoInvestigator | Mr. Walter E. Brown, Jr. |
| 5. | CoInvestigator | Dr. Thomas D. Carr |
| 6. | CoInvestigator | Dr. Samuel L. Gulkis |
| 7. | CoInvestigator | Prof. Fred T. Haddock |
| 8. | CoInvestigator | Christopher C. Harvey |
| 9. | CoInvestigator | Mr. Michael L. Kaiser |
| 10. | CoInvestigator | Dr. Yolande Leblanc |
| 11. | CoInvestigator | Mr. R. G. Peltzer |
| 12. | CoInvestigator | Dr. Roger J. Phillips |
| 13. | CoInvestigator | Mr. Anthony C. Riddle |
| 14. | CoInvestigator | Prof. David H. Staelin |
SPASE version 2.2.0
Voyager 2 was one of a pair of spacecraft launched to explore the planets of the outer solar system and the interplanetary environment. Each Voyager had as its major objectives at each planet to: (1) investigate the circulation, dynamics, structure, and composition of the planet's atmosphere; (2) characterize the morphology, geology, and physical state of the satellites of the planet; (3) provide improved values for the mass, size, and shape of the planet, its satellites, and any rings; and, (4) determine the magnetic field structure and characterize the composition and distribution of energetic trapped particles and plasma therein.
Spacecraft and Subsystems
Each Voyager consisted of a decahedral bus, 47 cm in height and 1.78 m across from flat to flat. A 3.66 m diameter parabolic high-gain antenna was mounted on top of the bus. The major portion of the science instruments were mounted on a science boom extending out some 2.5 m from the spacecraft. At the end of the science boom was a steerable scan platform on which were mounted the imaging and spectroscopic remote sensing instruments. Also mounted at various distances along the science boom were the plasma and charged particle detectors. The magnetometers were located along a separate boom extending 13 m on the side opposite the science boom. A third boom, extending down and away from the science instruments, held the spacecraft's radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs). Two 10 m whip antennas (used for the plasma wave and planetary radio astronomy investigations) also extended from the spacecraft, each perpendicular to the other. The spacecraft was three-axis spin stabilized to enable long integration times and selective viewing for the instruments mounted on the scan platform.
Power was provided to the spacecraft systems and instruments through the use of three radioisotope thermoelectric generators. The RTGs were assembled in tandem on a deployable boom hinged on an outrigger arrangement of struts attached to the basic structure. Each RTG unit, contained in a beryllium outer case, was 40.6 cm in diameter, 50.8 cm in length, and weighed 39 kg. The RTGs used a radioactive source (Plutonium-238 in the form of plutonium oxide, or PuO2, in this case) which, as it decayed, gave off heat. A bi-metallic thermoelectric device was used to convert the heat to electric power for the spacecraft. The total output of RTGs slowly decreases with time as the radioactive material is expended. Therefore, although the initial output of the RTGs on Voyager was approximately 470 W of 30 V DC power at launch, it had fallen off to approximately 335 W by the beginning of 1997 (about 19.5 years post-launch). As power continues to decrease, power loads on the spacecraft must also decrease. Current estimates (1998) are that increasingly limited instrument operations can be carried out at least until 2020.
Communications were provided through the high-gain antenna with a low-gain antenna for backup. The high-gain antenna supported both X-band and S-band downlink telemetry. Voyager was the first spacecraft to utilize X-band as the primary telemetry link frequency. Data could be stored for later transmission to Earth through the use of an on-board digital tape recorder.
Voyager, because of its distance from Earth and the resulting time-lag for commanding, was designed to operate in a highly-autonomous manner. In order to do this and carry out the complex sequences of spacecraft motions and instrument operations, three interconnected on-board computers were utilized. The Computer Command Subsystem (CCS) was responsible for storing commanding for the other two computers and issuing the commands at set times. The Attitude and Articulation Control Subsystem (AACS) was responsible for controlling spacecraft attitude and motions of the scan platform. The Flight Data Subsystem (FDS) controlled the instruments, including changes in configuration (state) or telemetry rates. All three computers had redundant components to ensure continued operations. The AACS included redundant star trackers and Sun sensors as well.
Message in a Bottle
Each Voyager has mounted to one of the sides of the bus a 12-inch gold-plated copper disk. The disk has recorded on it sounds and images of Earth designed to portray the diversity of life and culture on the planet. Each disk is encased in a protective aluminum jacket along with a cartridge and a needle. Instructions explaining from where the spacecraft originated and how to play the disk are engraved onto the jacket. Electroplated onto a 2 cm area on the cover is also an ultra-pure source of uranium-238 (with a radioactivity of about 0.26 nanocuries and a half-life of 4.51 billion years), allowing the determination of the elapsed time since launch by measuring the amount of daughter elements to remaining U238. The 115 images on the disk were encoded in analog form. The sound selections (including greetings in 55 languages, 35 sounds, natural and man-made, and portions of 27 musical pieces) are designed for playback at 1000 rpm. The Voyagers were not the first spacecraft designed with such messages to the future. Pioneers 10 and 11, LAGEOS, and the Apollo landers also included plaques with a similar intent, though not quite so ambitious.
Mission Profile
Originally planned as a Grand Tour of the outer planets, including dual launches to Jupiter, Saturn, and Pluto in 1976-77 and dual launches to Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune in 1979, budgetary constraints caused a dramatic rescoping of the project to two spacecraft, each of which would go to only Jupiter and Saturn. The new mission was called Mariner Jupiter/Saturn, or MJS. It was subsequently renamed Voyager about six months prior to launch. The rescoped mission was estimated to cost $250 million (through the end of Saturn operations), only a third of what the Grand Tour design would have cost.
Voyager 2 was the first of the two spacecraft to be launched, with liftoff occurring 20 Aug. 1977. What was at first an auspicious launch, however, proved to be the beginning of a number of problems. The primary cause of the initial problems were attributed to commanding by the AACS, including difficulty in determining the full deployment of the science boom. These problems resulted in a delay of four days in the launch of Voyager 1 to ensure they wouldn't occur for it.
Although launched sixteen days after Voyager 2, Voyager 1's trajectory was the quicker one to Jupiter. On 15 Dec. 1977, while both spacecraft were in the asteroid belt, Voyager 1 surpassed Voyager 2's distance from the Sun.
Several months after launch, in April 1978, Voyager 2's primary radio receiver failed, automatically kicking in the backup receiver which proved to be faulty. Attempts to recover the use of the primary receiver failed and the backup receiver was used for the remainder of the mission. Although use of the backup receiver made communication with the spacecraft more difficult, engineers were able to find workarounds.
Voyager 2 proceeded with its primary mission and flew by Jupiter (closest approach on 09 July 1979) and Saturn (05 Aug. 1981). During these flybys, Voyager 2 obtained images roughly equal in number to Voyager 1 (18,000 at Jupiter, 16,000 at Saturn).
Voyager 2's launch date had preserved one part of the original Grand Tour design, i.e. the possibility of an extended mission to Uranus and Neptune. Despite the difficulties encountered, scientists and engineers had been able to make Voyager enormously successful. As a result, approval was granted to extend the mission, first to Uranus, then to Neptune and later to continue observations well past Neptune. Voyager 2 made successful flybys of Uranus (24 Jan. 1986) and Neptune (25 Aug. 1989). Because of the additional distance of these two planets, adaptations had to made to accomodate the lower light levels and decreased communications. Voyager 2 was successfully able to obtain about 8,000 images of Uranus and its satellites. Additional improvements in the on-board software and use of image compression techniques allowed about 10,000 images of Neptune and its satellites to be taken.
All of the experiments on Voyager 2 have produced useful data.
Onward and Outward
Rechristened the Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM) by NASA in 1989 after its encounter with Neptune, Voyager 2 continues operations, taking measurements of the interplanetary magnetic field, plasma, and charged particle environment while searching for the heliopause (the distance at which the solar wind becomes subsumed by the more general interstellar wind). Through the end of the Neptune phase of the Voyager project, a total of $875 million had been expended for the construction, launch, and operations of both Voyager spacecraft. An additional $30 million was allocated for the first two years of VIM.
Voyager 2 is speeding away from the Sun at a velocity of about 3.13 AU/year toward a point in the sky of RA=338 degrees, Dec=-62 degrees (-47.46 degrees ecliptic latitude, 310.89 degrees ecliptic longitude).
Information about the Voyager 2 mission
| Role | Person | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Project scientist | Prof. Edward C. Stone, Jr. |
SPASE version 2.2.0
Voyager 1 and 2 was a pair of spacecraft launched to explore the planets of the outer solar system and the interplanetary environment. Each Voyager had as its major objectives at each planet to: (1) investigate the circulation, dynamics, structure, and composition of the planet's atmosphere; (2) characterize the morphology, geology, and physical state of the satellites of the planet; (3) provide improved values for the mass, size, and shape of the planet, its satellites, and any rings; and, (4) determine the magnetic field structure and characterize the composition and distribution of energetic trapped particles and plasma therein.
Spacecraft and Subsystems
Each Voyager consisted of a decahedral bus, 47 cm in height and 1.78 m across from flat to flat. A 3.66 m diameter parabolic high-gain antenna was mounted on top of the bus. The major portion of the science instruments were mounted on a science boom extending out some 2.5 m from the spacecraft. At the end of the science boom was a steerable scan platform on which were mounted the imaging and spectroscopic remote sensing instruments. Also mounted at various distances along the science boom were the plasma and charged particle detectors. The magnetometers were located along a separate boom extending 13 m on the side opposite the science boom. A third boom, extending down and away from the science instruments, held the spacecraft's radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs). Two 10 m whip antennas (used for the plasma wave and planetary radio astronomy investigations) also extended from the spacecraft, each perpendicular to the other. The spacecraft was three-axis spin stabilized to enable long integration times and selective viewing for the instruments mounted on the scan platform.
Power was provided to the spacecraft systems and instruments through the use of three radioisotope thermoelectric generators. The RTGs were assembled in tandem on a deployable boom hinged on an outrigger arrangement of struts attached to the basic structure. Each RTG unit, contained in a beryllium outer case, was 40.6 cm in diameter, 50.8 cm in length, and weighed 39 kg. The RTGs used a radioactive source (Plutonium-238 in the form of plutonium oxide, or PuO2, in this case) which, as it decayed, gave off heat. A bi-metallic thermoelectric device was used to convert the heat to electric power for the spacecraft. The total output of RTGs slowly decreases with time as the radioactive material is expended. Therefore, although the initial output of the RTGs on Voyager was approximately 470 W of 30 V DC power at launch, it had fallen off to approximately 335 W by the beginning of 1997 (about 19.5 years post-launch). As power continues to decrease, power loads on the spacecraft must also decrease. Current estimates (1998) are that increasingly limited instrument operations can be carried out at least until 2020.
Communications were provided through the high-gain antenna with a low-gain antenna for backup. The high-gain antenna supported both X-band and S-band downlink telemetry. Voyager was the first spacecraft to utilize X-band as the primary telemetry link frequency. Data could be stored for later transmission to Earth through the use of an on-board digital tape recorder.
Voyager, because of its distance from Earth and the resulting time-lag for commanding, was designed to operate in a highly-autonomous manner. In order to do this and carry out the complex sequences of spacecraft motions and instrument operations, three interconnected on-board computers were utilized. The Computer Command Subsystem (CCS) was responsible for storing commanding for the other two computers and issuing the commands at set times. The Attitude and Articulation Control Subsystem (AACS) was responsible for controlling spacecraft attitude and motions of the scan platform. The Flight Data Subsystem (FDS) controlled the instruments, including changes in configuration (state) or telemetry rates. All three computers had redundant components to ensure continued operations. The AACS included redundant star trackers and Sun sensors as well.
Message in a Bottle
Each Voyager has mounted to one of the sides of the bus a 12-inch gold-plated copper disk. The disk has recorded on it sounds and images of Earth designed to portray the diversity of life and culture on the planet. Each disk is encased in a protective aluminum jacket along with a cartridge and a needle. Instructions explaining from where the spacecraft originated and how to play the disk are engraved onto the jacket. Electroplated onto a 2 cm area on the cover is also an ultra-pure source of uranium-238 (with a radioactivity of about 0.26 nanocuries and a half-life of 4.51 billion years), allowing the determination of the elapsed time since launch by measuring the amount of daughter elements to remaining U238. The 115 images on the disk were encoded in analog form. The sound selections (including greetings in 55 languages, 35 sounds, natural and man-made, and portions of 27 musical pieces) are designed for playback at 1000 rpm. The Voyagers were not the first spacecraft designed with such messages to the future. Pioneers 10 and 11, LAGEOS, and the Apollo landers also included plaques with a similar intent, though not quite so ambitious.
Information about the Voyager 1 mission
Information about the Voyager 2 mission
| Role | Person | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Project scientist | Prof. Edward C. Stone, Jr. |
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.1
SPASE version 2.2.1
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.1
SPASE version 2.2.1
SPASE version 2.2.1
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.0
SPASE version 2.2.1
Data Repository at The University of Iowa, Radio and Plasma Wave Research Group. The Radio and Plasma Wave Group in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in The University of Iowa specializes in the study of naturally occurring radio and plasma waves in space plasmas. The group has provided radio and plasma wave receivers for more than 20 space missions, including Voyagers 1 and 2, Geotail, Wind, Cassini, Cluster (Rumba, Salsa, Samba, Tango), and Mars Express, which are currently operational. Our instrument on Galileo entered the atmosphere of Jupiter along with the rest of the spacecraft in September, 2003, and the Earth-orbiting Polar spacecraft was decommissioned in April, 2008. The group has recently developed an instrument for Juno, the Jupiter polar orbiter successfully launched August 5, 2011. We are also working on instruments for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes which will study the Earth's radiation belts, ionosphere, and thermosphere after launch in 2012. This group is also the home of the outer planets subnode of the Planetary Data System's Planetary Plasma Interactions Node which provides access to and expertise on radio and plasma wave data sets from the Voyager observations at the outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune; Galileo observations from Venus, Earth, and Jupiter; and Pioneer 10 and 11 Geiger Tube Telescope observations at Jupiter and Saturn. Wideband plasma wave observations from a number of Earth-orbiting spacecraft including Dynamics Explorer (DE) 1, International Sun Earth Explorers (ISEE) 1 and 2, Interplanetary Monitoring Platform (IMP) 6, Hawkeye, Small Scientific Satellite (SSS), Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracing Explorer (AMPTE), and Injun V are being archived here and can be ordered or accessed via specialized software. Browse images of some of these data are also available as part of our Space Physics Data Center. The plasma wave group consists of one faculty member and several scientists, engineers, programmers, and support personnel.
Access to pages describing current and past spacecraft projects, description of the Radio and Plasma Wave Group, their publications and links to other data system projects.
Please acknowledge the project PI and The University of Iowa.
| Role | Person | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Principal investigator | Prof. Donald A. Gurnett |
| 2. | Principal investigator | Dr. William S. Kurth |
| 3. | Principal investigator | Ms. Jolene S. Pickett |
| 4. | Principal investigator | Dr. Roger R. Anderson |
| 5. | General contact | Ms. Kathy R. Kurth |
| 6. | Scientist | Dr. George B. Hospodarsky |
| 7. | Scientist | Dr. J. Douglas Menietti |
| 8. | Scientist | Dr. David D. Morgan |
| 9. | Data producer | Mr. Richard L. Huff |
| 10. | Data producer | Ms. Ann M. Persoon |
| 11. | Technical contact | Mr. Larry J. Granroth |
Data access is available from the spacecraft project links off of the home page